Epistemic Evaluation
Download Epistemic Evaluation full books in PDF, epub, and Kindle. Read online free Epistemic Evaluation ebook anywhere anytime directly on your device. Fast Download speed and no annoying ads. We cannot guarantee that every ebooks is available!
Epistemic Evaluation
Author | : David K. Henderson |
Publisher | : Oxford University Press, USA |
Total Pages | : 302 |
Release | : 2015 |
Genre | : Philosophy |
ISBN | : 019964263X |
Download Epistemic Evaluation Book in PDF, Epub and Kindle
Twelve leading philosophers explore and apply a particular methodology in epistemology, which might be called purposeful epistemology. The idea is that considerations about the point and purpose of our concepts (or epistemic norms) promise to yield important insights for epistemological theorizing.
Epistemic Evaluation Related Books
Language: en
Pages: 302
Pages: 302
Type: BOOK - Published: 2015 - Publisher: Oxford University Press, USA
Twelve leading philosophers explore and apply a particular methodology in epistemology, which might be called purposeful epistemology. The idea is that consider
Language: en
Pages: 276
Pages: 276
Type: BOOK - Published: 2018-07-05 - Publisher: Cornell University Press
Much of the writing in Anglo-American epistemology in the twentieth century focused on the conditions for beliefs being "justified." In a book that seeks to shi
Language: en
Pages: 272
Pages: 272
Type: BOOK - Published: 2015-10-01 - Publisher: OUP Oxford
Epistemic Evaluation aims to explore and apply a particular methodology in epistemology. The methodology is to consider the point(s) or purpose(s) of our episte
Language: en
Pages: 302
Pages: 302
Type: BOOK - Published: 2015 - Publisher:
This volume aims to explore and apply a particular methodology in epistemology. The methodology is to consider the point(s) or purpose(s) of our epistemic evalu
Language: en
Pages: 470
Pages: 470
Type: BOOK - Published: 2014-04-13 - Publisher: Springer
Markus Seidel provides a detailed critique of epistemic relativism in the sociology of scientific knowledge. In addition to scrutinizing the main arguments for