Influence Of Implant Surface Modification On Osseointegrative And Antibacterial Properties In The Setting Of Mrsa

INTRODUCTION: When periprosthetic infection (PJI) often occurs in patients who have undergone orthopaedic procedures, the complication can substantially increase patient care costs; specifically, PJI may lead to more clinic/hospital visits, multiple revision surgeries, long-term patient disability, and increased mortality. Previous studies have shown that titania nanotube (TiNT) surfaces demonstrate increased bone-implant contact (BIC), enhanced de novo bone formation, and greater implant pull-out forces than non-textured controls. This study evaluated in vitro antibacterial properties of TiNT surfaces, TiNT surfaces integrated with nanosilver (TiNT+Ag), and two current standard-of-care materials (titanium thermal plasma sprayed and titanium alloy surfaces; TPS and Ti, respectively).METHODS: Following Institutional Biosafety Committee and Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee approval, the first in vitro experiment evaluated sterile coupons of TiNT surfaces with diameters of 60nm, 80nm, 110nm, and 150nm submerged in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth and inoculated with 105 colony-forming units (CFU/mL) of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), quantified at four timepoints (0, 1, 4, 24 hours). A second in vitro experiment quantified viable bacteria by drop-seeding MRSA (105, 106, 108 CFU/mL) suspended in LB directly onto the four sample surfaces, then rinsing and sonicating in culture media at four timepoints (2, 6, 24, 48 hours). In a follow-on in vivo study, New Zealand White rabbits were anesthetized and underwent bilateral antegrade implantation of an intramedullary tibial implant with one of the four sample surfaces (n=12 animals per implant group; 2-week endpoint for all). One tibia received a human clinical isolate of MRSA (105 CFU/mL) suspended in LB broth on the implant surface at the time of implantation (experimental limb), while the contralateral tibia received LB broth (no MRSA) (control limb). At endpoint, six animals per implant group were randomized to sonication analysis and six were randomized to histology (Stevenelu2019s Blue with a van Gieson counterstain and gram staining) and osseointegration imaging [of the proximal tibia via high-resolution microcomputed tomography (u00b5CT)] analyses. At endpoint, implants designated for sonication analysis were removed from each tibiae and sonicated in sterile phosphate buffered saline to quantify viable bacteria from the implant surface. As a small pilot study, an additional u201ctherapeuticu201d cohort (TC) of rabbits (n=12) underwent the same procedure, allowed infection to develop for 4 days, and then received vancomycin treatment (30 mg/kg; subcutaneous, twice per day) for 7 days, until endpoint. Per implant group, two animals were randomized to sonication analysis, while one was randomized to histology and imaging analyses. Histologic analysis of gram-stained sections of tibiae was performed using a custom MatLab program to randomize six regions of interest (ROI) and quantify gram-positive bacteria (GP), focusing on high specificity, at the bone-implant interface. RESULTS: The first in vitro experiment indicated that none of the material surfaces could kill MRSA in surrounding LB broth; however, the direct seeding method showed lower MRSA counts on the TiNT groups at all timepoints and on the TiNT+Ag group at the 24 hr and 48 hr timepoints. TiNT surfaces with 110nm diameters showed the lowest bacteria counts compared to other nanotube diameters, and were subsequently used for all in vivo work. In the in vivo experiment, sonication analysis showed that viable MRSA was greater on the TiNT and TiNT+Ag surfaces (104 CFU/mL, on average) vs. the Ti and TPS surfaces (103 CFU/mL, on average). In the TC, viable bacteria in the sonicant was approximately 102 to 103 CFU/mL for TiNT+Ag and TiNT implants, compared to 104 CFU/mL in the TPS group. u00b5CT analysis of infected limbs showed greatest BIC on TPS implants, followed by TiNT, TiNT+Ag, and Ti. BIC was significantly greater in TiNT+Ag vs. Ti implants (p=0.023) and TPS vs. TiNT+Ag implants (p=0.031). Bone volume fraction (BV/TV) was significantly greater in TPS implants (0.163 u00b1 0.052) than Ti (p=0.016), TiNT (p=0.011), and TiNT+Ag (p=0.015) groups. TPS implants also demonstrated significantly greater tissue mineral density (TMD) than Ti (p=0.001), TiNT (p=0.003), and TiNT+Ag (p=0.003). In the TC, BIC% was greatest in the TPS group (0.277%) and approximately equivalent in the Ti, TiNT, and TiNT+Ag groups (0.15%, 0.1%, and 0.086%, respectively). Analysis of histologic sections demonstrated TiNT+Ag had the greatest BIC%, on average, (41%, range, 18-60), followed by TiNT (33%; range, 12-53), Ti (15%; range, 0-34), and TPS (12%, range, 3-28). In the TC, BIC% was greatest in TiNT+Ag implants (24%), followed by TPS (16%), Ti (15%), and TiNT (8%). On average, Ti had the lowest GP% (6%; range, 2-13), followed by TiNT+Ag (9%, range 3-14), TPS (10%, range 3-21), and TiNT (13%, range 1-26). In the TC, Ti had the lowest GP% (3%), followed by TiNT (5%), TPS (8%), and TiNT+Ag (15%). DISCUSSION: Results from in vitro drop-seeding experiments indicated that TiNT and TiNT+Ag surfaces were more efficacious in resisting MRSA biofilm formation, compared to Ti and TPS. Sonication analysis indicated that TPS and Ti implants had less viable bacteria; however, overnight incubations showed that the implants continued to grow bacteria after sonication, perhaps indicating that differential adhesion of bacteria or decreased biofilm formation of the various surfaces may have interfered with assessment of in vivo antimicrobial efficacy. Specifically, the authors hypothesize that during sonication, bacteria detach more readily from nanotube surfaces, resulting in increased viable MRSA in the sonicant of nanotube implants compared with sonicant from TPS and Ti implants. With a reduction in viable bacteria from nanotube surfaces following antibiotic treatment, MRSA clearance rates may improve with the NT surface modification. Osseointegrative properties, measured by u00b5CT, in the setting of infection were greatest in TPS implants; however histologic analysis showed greatest BIC% in TiNT+Ag implants as well as greater cortical connectivity (contiguous bone between bone-implant interface and cortical shell) in the nanotube cohorts. Ti showed the lowest GP% in both the non-TC and TC cohorts, followed by TiNT+Ag in the non-TC cohort and TiNT in the TC cohort.SIGNIFICANCE/CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Titiania nanotube surfaces may provide improvement over current implant technologies by simultaneously enhancing osseointegration, especially in non-tapered applications (e.g. tibial trays, fusion cages), as well as antibacterial properties. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Work was funded through the University of Michigan MTRAC for Life Sciences Innovation Hub (Subcontract #3004361821).