The Comparison of Dental Implant Surfaces and Their Effect on Osseointegration in the Aesthetic Zone + Clinical and Radiographic Case Report

The Comparison of Dental Implant Surfaces and Their Effect on Osseointegration in the Aesthetic Zone + Clinical and Radiographic Case Report
Author: Gozlu Muammer
Publisher:
Total Pages:
Release: 2017
Genre:
ISBN:

Download The Comparison of Dental Implant Surfaces and Their Effect on Osseointegration in the Aesthetic Zone + Clinical and Radiographic Case Report Book in PDF, Epub and Kindle

The comparison of dental implant surfaces and their effect on osseointegration in the aesthetic zone ; Clinical and Radiographic case reportBackground: Recent studies have encouraged a progressive shortening of the healing period for single-tooth implants and immediate loading has been proposed for the aesthetic zone in the maxilla. The biological fixation between the dental implant surfaces and jaw bones should be considered a prerequisite for the long-term success of implant-supported prostheses.Aim/Hypothesis : The aim of this case is to compare the effectiveness of immediate single implants with different surface in the aesthetic zone.Materials and Methods : Patients requiring a single tooth implant-supported restoration in the maxillary esthetic zone received the implant with rough surface and combine surface (rough surface + machined surface) placed in healed sites. The combine implant surfaces is also called hybrid implant. Implants that achieved an insertion torque of at least 35 Ncm were immediately non-occlusally loaded. The screw-retained provisional crown was delivered within 7 hours following the surgery and non functionally loaded. The definitive prosthesis was delivered within 2 months after implant insertion. Two months later the osteointegration progress was evaluated in all installed implants using: Dental X-rays and Osstellu2122 system.Results : After two months period of healing, high level of integration was observed. The stability of these implants was measured using Osstellu2122 system. These implants showed higher values ; ISQ 75 (hybrid) and 76 (rough surface), respectively. It also observed a good soft tissue adaptation clinically. No complications were observed. Radiographic bone changes were similar in both dental implants.Conclusions and Clinical implications :Both implants is a valuable treatment option for immediate implant placement and loading of single crowns in the maxillary esthetic zone.